|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 2, 2012 13:42:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by anonthemoose on Feb 2, 2012 21:29:29 GMT -5
Some folks see a Millennium Falcon; I see a behind. I also tend to see the ZigZag papers dude when others see Jesus on a tortilla.
It's all about what we want/expect to see.
I agree, "Ah, Sweet Mysteries"
|
|
|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 9, 2012 18:50:39 GMT -5
The "Flagstaff Stone," with inscriptions said to be 100,000 years old, studied for a time in the 1980s then reportedly confiscated by the federal government, present whereabouts unknown. Jeffrey Goodman who discovered the stone used it for his thesis that man originated in the New World, that human antiquity in the Americas is far greater than thought. This site ties it into other matters. missionignition.net/bethe/GSU_Geostat_Report.phpAs far as Goodman's ideas go, some of the skulls estimated to be 50,000 to 70,000 years old turned out to be less than 20k years old. Goodman is like Velikovsky, innovative but way off base. |
|
|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 11, 2012 16:34:22 GMT -5
Then there is the Kensington Stone, turned up by a Swedish farmer in Minnesota in 1898. When the runes are translated, they tell of 30 Northman explorers leaving that record in 1362. So what if most experts think it's a forgery; who or why would someone forge such an inscription? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kensington_Runestone |
|
