|
|
Post by lubbockgoper on Feb 26, 2012 14:01:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 27, 2012 11:55:24 GMT -5
David Horowitz and the "David Horowitz Freedom Center" have been taking a dog and pony show called "Stop Islamicization of America" to college campuses. See their website at sioaonline.com/ Horowitz is part and parcel of the radical pro-Jewish lobby that includes Pamela Geller. atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/about.htmlPoint being that this was not some innocuous intellectual event. It was akin to an event thrown by the American Nazi Party at a college campus, and it naturally drew opposition. Any middle of the road American, Jewish or not, would be disgusted by Horowitz. Did you notice how The Blaze said -- "Activists from “(un)Occupy Albuquerque” – a group allied with the Occupy Wall Street movement – started a “people’s mic” seen frequently during the Occupy Wall Street protests." Other than using the technique of a "people's mike" The Blaze did not say how it connected this protest to Occupy Wall Street. It's a stretch to connect an economic protest movement to a demonstration against a pro-fascist rally. Would OWS protesters join in? Quite possibly, but only because one concerned with fairness to the extent of protesting could be drawn to either cause. Would someone protesting racial segregation also protest discrimination against Jews? Quite possibly. So, imo, this was more trash journalism by The Blaze. |
|
|
|
Post by lubbockgoper on Feb 27, 2012 19:29:04 GMT -5
(UN) occupy is used because native Americans find the word occupy offensive but they are the same.
And it doesn't matter what the event is, these tools don't get to decide what is and is not disrupted. Ass-whooping is in order here.
|
|
|
|
Post by anonthemoose on Feb 27, 2012 20:42:32 GMT -5
(UN) occupy is used because native Americans find the word occupy offensive but they are the same. And it doesn't matter what the event is, these tools don't get to decide what is and is not disrupted. Ass-whooping is in order here. I understand. Ass-whooping is so much better than using speech for a moronboorpiggopher. Speech is difficult for some. |
|
|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 27, 2012 22:19:28 GMT -5
(UN) occupy is used because native Americans find the word occupy offensive but they are the same. And it doesn't matter what the event is, these tools don't get to decide what is and is not disrupted. Ass-whooping is in order here. So you are for showing proper respect toward events you disagree with? Would that include Democratic Party events? And how do you feel about Neugie saying "baby killer" on the floor of Congress that time? |
|
|
|
Post by anonthemoose on Feb 28, 2012 7:38:25 GMT -5
(UN) occupy is used because native Americans find the word occupy offensive but they are the same. And it doesn't matter what the event is, these tools don't get to decide what is and is not disrupted. Ass-whooping is in order here. So you are for showing proper respect toward events you disagree with? Would that include Democratic Party events? And how do you feel about Neugie saying "baby killer" on the floor of Congress that time? Or the Muslim who attacked the atheist wearing the zombie Mohammed costume, or the Muslims rioting and killing US soldiers for burning Qu'rans? They're just reacting to perceived insults, so I guess that's okay. Why use speech when fists, guns, and/or bombs will do? |
|
|
|
Post by lubbockgoper on Feb 28, 2012 7:47:45 GMT -5
(UN) occupy is used because native Americans find the word occupy offensive but they are the same. And it doesn't matter what the event is, these tools don't get to decide what is and is not disrupted. Ass-whooping is in order here. I understand. Ass-whooping is so much better than using speech for a moronboorpiggopher. Speech is difficult for some. If anyone is having an event, no matter the side or cause, no one should be allowed to come in and disrupt it with their agenda. No one. Period. I know the occupy basement dweller losers don't have the means to rent a venue for their own event and feel piggy backing on real citizens events is an acceptable course of action but it should be met with force if necessary. I know we should be glad they are actually doing SOMETHING but this is wrong. Again, most of these little libtard, pot smoking turds sense of entitlement needs be dialed back and forcibly removing a couple would cause the rest to scatter back to their basements and resume their life with Wizards of Warcraft. |
|
|
|
Post by elalacran on Feb 28, 2012 10:35:33 GMT -5
What form of dissent is not disruptive? Voting. Responding to a poll. Staying away.
But my point is that any demonstration however peaceable is disruptive to some degree. That's the whole point of demonstrating, to distract, to disrupt.
Picket line -- disruptive.
Wearing Tee shirts with a protest message -- disruptive, or at least some were thrown out of the crowd at a Bush speech for nothing more than wearing anti-Bush slogans on tee shirts.
Taking out a big newspaper ad. But an ad to be effective needs to jump out at ya and get attention and to be disruptive to one's normal newspaper reading activity.
The only alternative to being disruptive is to --
1. Protest by not attending. How useful or satisfying is that?
2. Go but be placid and quiet and not express any opinion. That way you are counted as a supporter!
Whatever happened to "all that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing?"
How a Tea Partier would be so against disruption is hard to fathom.
Was the original Boston Tea Party disruptive? Definitely. So was throwing rocks and committing acts of vandalism and tarring and feathering Tories. American democracy is sort of based in disruption, ain't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by anonthemoose on Feb 29, 2012 13:31:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lubbockgoper on Feb 29, 2012 20:14:50 GMT -5
"Organizers won't take a position on what grievances should be included, Pollok said, but they will likely include issues like getting money out of politics, dealing with the foreclosure crisis and helping students handle loan debt."
So two-thirds of their platform is trying do something to help grown people who took out loans but were too stupid to be able to pay them back?
What a great demographic... LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by anonthemoose on Mar 1, 2012 7:35:49 GMT -5
Feel free to go heckle them moronboorpiggopher.
|
|
|
|
Post by lubbockgoper on Mar 1, 2012 7:44:25 GMT -5
Feel free to go heckle them moronboorpiggopher. No one from the right will go heckle them. They rented their venue and have their agenda of events and they should be allowed to have it. Now that doesn't mean some other loser, radical, tree hugger, anarchist or other incarnation of libtard stupidity wont show up to make a point. But the right won't do it... |
|
